{"id":3824,"date":"2026-08-09T10:08:04","date_gmt":"2026-08-09T10:08:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/how-to-improve-domain-rating\/"},"modified":"2026-08-09T10:08:12","modified_gmt":"2026-08-09T10:08:12","slug":"how-to-improve-domain-rating","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/how-to-improve-domain-rating\/","title":{"rendered":"How to Improve Domain Rating in 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Most founders hear the same bad advice on domain rating. Build more links. Blast more directories. Chase bigger numbers. That&#039;s how you end up with a backlink profile that looks busy and still doesn&#039;t move <strong>DR<\/strong> much at all. The actual lever is not raw link count, it&#039;s <strong>unique referring domains<\/strong> from sites that carry actual authority, because <strong>Domain Rating<\/strong> is built around the <strong>quantity and quality of unique referring domains<\/strong>, not just backlinks from one place.<\/p>\n<p>That changes the game for startup SEO, SaaS SEO, and AI visibility work. Early gains usually come from adding distinct domains, especially from relevant startup and software directories, then compounding with editorial links and linkable assets over time. A realistic climb from <strong>DR 0 to DR 50<\/strong> is usually a <strong>12 to 18 month<\/strong> authority project, not a weekend submission sprint, and the smart play is to treat it like a portfolio. You want quality, diversity, and relevance, in that order.<\/p>\n<p><figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/how-to-improve-domain-rating-domain-rating-explained.jpg\" alt=\"An infographic explaining that Domain Rating is determined by quality and authority, not total backlink volume.\" \/><\/figure><\/p>\n<h2>Why Domain Rating Is Harder to Move Than It Looks<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Domain Rating<\/strong> is easy to misunderstand because it looks like a clean score. Founders see a number from Ahrefs and assume a bigger backlink count should force it upward. In practice, that&#039;s not how it works. The score is built around the <strong>number of distinct referring domains<\/strong> and the strength of those domains, so ten different websites usually matter more than a hundred links from one site.<\/p>\n<h3>Why one big pile of links can disappoint you<\/h3>\n<p>A link profile can be numerically busy and still weak. If one low-quality blog links to you a dozen times, or a single directory auto-generates repeated listings, the DR impact is limited because the profile lacks diversity. The more useful pattern is a spread of <strong>unique sites<\/strong>, ideally with some of them already carrying their own authority.<\/p>\n<p>The reason founders misread early gains is that DR feels linear when it isn&#039;t. It&#039;s a relative metric, and strong growth often happens only after you cross enough thresholds of trust and uniqueness. That&#039;s why a handful of credible startup directory placements can move the needle earlier than a larger pile of noisy backlinks.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><strong>Practical rule:<\/strong> treat DR like a <strong>medium-term authority signal<\/strong>, not a vanity metric. If the profile isn&#039;t expanding across multiple credible domains, the score won&#039;t respond the way most people expect.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h3>How Ahrefs DR differs from other authority scores<\/h3>\n<p>Ahrefs&#039; DR is its own metric, just like Moz&#039;s Domain Authority and Semrush&#039;s Authority Score are their own models. They don&#039;t measure the same thing in the same way, so comparisons only make sense inside one system. For startup teams, the useful question isn&#039;t which metric sounds stronger, it&#039;s whether your backlink profile is becoming harder to ignore.<\/p>\n<p>The early-stage implication is simple. A startup at low DR doesn&#039;t need a giant link spike. It needs a steady increase in <strong>distinct referring domains<\/strong>, plus a better mix of credible sources. That&#039;s why manual submission to <strong>startup directories<\/strong>, software directories, and relevant platform profiles still has a place in 2026.<\/p>\n<h3>What the fastest growth really looks like<\/h3>\n<p>A 2026 guide describes a path from <strong>DR 0 to DR 10 in 2 to 6 weeks<\/strong> and from <strong>DR 10 to DR 20 in 4 to 8 weeks<\/strong>, with the latter stage requiring about <strong>30 to 60 referring domains total<\/strong> and at least <strong>5 links from DR 50+ sites<\/strong>. The same guide estimates <strong>DR 0 to 50<\/strong> typically takes <strong>12 to 18 months<\/strong> of focused link building, which is why this is an authority play, not a technical fix. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bluehost.com\/blog\/domain-rating-vs-domain-authority\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bluehost&#039;s breakdown of DR vs. DA<\/a> is useful here because it reinforces the central point, DR growth comes from link diversity and authority, not volume for volume&#039;s sake.<\/p>\n<h2>Auditing Your Current Backlink Profile<\/h2>\n<p>Start with what already exists. I&#039;ve seen founders spend weeks hunting new links while their profile leaked signal through old spam, repeated anchors, and junk directories. A clean audit gives you the shortest path to useful work.<\/p>\n<p><figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/how-to-improve-domain-rating-backlink-audit.jpg\" alt=\"A checklist infographic illustrating the three steps for auditing a website&apos;s backlink profile for SEO purposes.\" \/><\/figure><\/p>\n<h3>Pull the right numbers first<\/h3>\n<p>Open <strong>Ahrefs Site Explorer<\/strong> and check three things immediately, <strong>DR<\/strong>, <strong>Referring domains<\/strong>, and the <strong>backlink profile distribution<\/strong>. Then move to <strong>Google Search Console<\/strong> and open the <strong>Links<\/strong> report to see which sites send links to your pages. That second view matters because it shows the links Google can already see, which helps you spot mismatches between what Ahrefs reports and what the site has already indexed.<\/p>\n<p>Use a toxicity checker as a first-pass filter. A suspicious link is only suspicious if it combines several signals, such as irrelevant topic, spammy language, strange anchor text, or obvious automation footprints. One bad link alone rarely matters. A cluster of them can.<\/p>\n<h3>Read the profile like a founder, not a dashboard tourist<\/h3>\n<p>Look at the <strong>DR histogram<\/strong> of your link sources. If most of your links come from tiny domains, a few directories, or one repeated network, you have a concentration problem. If your anchors are heavily branded, that is usually fine. If they are stuffed with exact-match commercial terms, that is a cleanup signal.<\/p>\n<p>A useful nofollow check is whether the profile looks natural. Guidance from SEO practice commonly recommends keeping the nofollow share below roughly <strong>30%<\/strong>, which means aiming for <strong>70%+ dofollow<\/strong>. The point is to avoid profiles that look artificial because every link is either blocked, templated, or inherited from weak sources. A walkthrough from a YouTube SEO guide on backlink cleanup and distribution is helpful here, especially for understanding how nofollow mix and anchor patterns interact in a real audit. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=cl1Ch9ARdQs\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">This Ahrefs-focused DR audit walkthrough<\/a> is the most direct reference in the material for that process.<\/p>\n<h3>Turn the audit into a fix list<\/h3>\n<p>Use a simple decision rule for each link source.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Keep it:<\/strong> relevant, indexed, and from a real site with some authority.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Improve it:<\/strong> valid source, but the profile is incomplete, the anchor is weak, or the listing needs better context.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Disavow it:<\/strong> obvious spam, repeated PBN behavior, or a toxic pattern that fits a manual-action or negative-SEO scenario.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>A lot of startup teams discover that a few high-quality directory placements matter more than dozens of weak submissions. For a clean shortlist, the <a href=\"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/best-startup-directories\">best startup directories<\/a> page is a practical place to compare options before you spend time on listings that will not help.<\/p>\n<h2>Where the Real DR Gains Come From<\/h2>\n<p>The fastest DR gains I&#039;ve seen on early SaaS sites came from a boring-looking mix of curated listings, a few credible mentions, and one or two assets people wanted to cite. The mistake is to think all \u201clink building\u201d looks the same. It doesn&#039;t. Some sources create trust quickly. Others just pad a spreadsheet.<\/p>\n<h3>The first 90 days usually follow a pattern<\/h3>\n<p>Week one through four is usually about foundation. That means startup directories, software marketplaces, and platform profiles that are reviewed, indexed, and topical. These links rarely feel glamorous, but they establish your first credible referring domains and help clean up branded search results.<\/p>\n<p>By the next phase, the founder should be hunting editorial placements that come from real audiences, not mass submission sites. Podcast show notes, niche guest posts, and a few resource-page inclusions can add diversity to the profile. At the same time, a useful linkable asset, such as a comparison page or original data page, starts earning passive mentions instead of forcing every link through outreach.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>A profile built on a handful of trusted startup and software directories usually ages better than one built on a flood of low-value auto-approve submissions.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h3>Which sources deserve the manual effort<\/h3>\n<p>The highest-value links for early-stage teams tend to come from sources that pass three tests, they&#039;re relevant, they&#039;re indexed, and they&#039;re not built for spam. That&#039;s why curated startup directories, software directories, and reputable profile pages remain useful. A manual directory submission service can help here if it avoids junk networks and focuses on legitimate listings. One example is <a href=\"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/directory-submission-service\">Directory Submission Service<\/a>, which is relevant when you need structured, manual placements instead of scattershot submissions.<\/p>\n<p>Low-value mass directories are different. They may add noise without trust. They can also create a backlink profile that looks automated, which is the opposite of what you want if you&#039;re trying to improve DR and build startup SEO credibility.<\/p>\n<h3>Link source quality versus DR impact<\/h3>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tr>\n<th>Link Source<\/th>\n<th align=\"right\">Typical Source DR<\/th>\n<th align=\"right\">Effort<\/th>\n<th>Expected DR Impact<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Curated startup directories<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">Moderate to high<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">Low to medium<\/td>\n<td>Good early signal<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Software marketplaces<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">High<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">Medium<\/td>\n<td>Strong if indexed and relevant<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Podcast show notes<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">Variable<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">Medium<\/td>\n<td>Good for diversity<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Niche guest posts<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">Moderate to high<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">High<\/td>\n<td>Strong when editorially placed<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Auto-approve directories<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">Low<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">Low<\/td>\n<td>Usually weak or noisy<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table><\/figure>\n<p>In practice, the founder who wins the first year isn&#039;t the one who submits everywhere. It&#039;s the one who chooses placements that build a cleaner, broader, more credible referring-domain base.<\/p>\n<h2>Running Outreach That Earns DR 50+ Placements<\/h2>\n<p>Outreach fails when it starts from \u201cplease link to me\u201d instead of \u201cthis is useful to your audience.\u201d Editors can smell a template instantly. The outreach that lands is targeted, specific, and tied to a page they would want to cite.<\/p>\n<h3>Qualify prospects before you pitch<\/h3>\n<p>Start by filtering prospects on two things, <strong>topical relevance<\/strong> and <strong>authority<\/strong>. If the site has strong DR but the audience is unrelated, the link usually won&#039;t fit naturally. If the site is relevant but has no authority, it won&#039;t move DR much. The sweet spot is a credible site that already publishes content your buyers read.<\/p>\n<p>The best targets are often smaller than founders expect. Niche blogs, resource hubs, and software comparison sites can outperform big generic publications because the link feels editorial. Broken-link outreach, unlinked mention hunting, and resource-page inclusion all work for the same reason, they give the editor a reason to say yes without rewriting the pitch into something generic.<\/p>\n<h3>Write pitches that don&#039;t sound like templates<\/h3>\n<p>The subject line should be plain. The email should identify the exact page, exact angle, and exact reason the editor should care. If you&#039;re offering a guest post, the topic has to fit their content gaps. If you&#039;re asking for a mention, the asset must deserve citation. If you&#039;re asking for a partnership link, the collaboration needs to create something public, such as an integration page, webinar, or joint report.<\/p>\n<p>I&#039;ve found five well-targeted pitches per week usually beat fifty generic ones because the follow-up quality stays high and the message doesn&#039;t degrade. That pace also gives you time to tailor link placement language so the anchor looks natural. Editors often rewrite overly optimized anchors, and that can turn a link from useful into irrelevant fast.<\/p>\n<h3>Use assets that make the link easy to justify<\/h3>\n<p>The cleanest links usually come from assets that solve a real problem. Think original data, free tools, comparison charts, or a focused resource that other founders want to reference. That&#039;s also where broader startup marketing and AI search optimization work begins to overlap with DR work, because the same asset that earns a backlink can also show up in AI answers and branded search.<\/p>\n<p>For SaaS founders building an AI-friendly footprint, <a href=\"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/saas-directory-submission-service\">SaaS Directory Submission Service<\/a> is one of several ways to establish early profile depth without relying on mass outreach. Use it as a distribution layer, not a substitute for editorial links.<\/p>\n<h2>Disavowing Toxic Links and Cleaning the Profile<\/h2>\n<p>Cleanup isn&#039;t glamorous, but it protects the work that matters. A messy backlink profile can slow trust growth, especially if the site has years of old directories, foreign-language spam, or strange anchor patterns hanging off it. That said, disavow is not a reflex. It&#039;s a tool for specific problems.<\/p>\n<p><figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/how-to-improve-domain-rating-disavow-links.jpg\" alt=\"A flowchart explaining the step-by-step process for identifying, evaluating, and disavowing toxic backlinks for SEO improvement.\" \/><\/figure><\/p>\n<h3>When disavow actually makes sense<\/h3>\n<p>Use disavow when you have a manual action, a clear negative SEO pattern, or a link history that&#039;s obviously polluted. If the profile is merely weak, disavowing won&#039;t magically boost DR. It just removes risk. The better move is usually to prune junk, improve legitimate listings, and build stronger referring domains.<\/p>\n<p>A suspicious backlink should be judged on <strong>DR<\/strong>, traffic quality, topic fit, and how it was earned. If it&#039;s from a dead directory, a spun content farm, or a site with unrelated anchors across every page, that&#039;s a problem. If it&#039;s from a legitimate low-DR site that happens to be new, it may still be fine.<\/p>\n<h3>Remove first, disavow second<\/h3>\n<p>Try to contact the site owner before disavowing. If the link can be removed at the source, that&#039;s cleaner than leaving it in place and filing a disavow. Then create a plain text file, format the bad domains or URLs clearly, and submit it through <strong>Google Search Console<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The rest of the cleanup work is smaller but often more useful. Claim abandoned profiles so your brand details stay consistent. Remove irrelevant directory listings that send mixed signals. Consolidate duplicate brand mentions where possible so your profile stops fragmenting across half-finished citations.<\/p>\n<p>For founders who want a cleaner baseline before outreach, the <a href=\"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/free-startup-directories\">Free Startup Directories<\/a> page is a safer filter than random list-hunting. It helps separate worth-claiming profiles from noisy submissions that only add clutter.<\/p>\n<h2>On-Site Work That Makes Off-Site Links Count<\/h2>\n<p>Links only help if the site can absorb them. I&#039;ve watched strong editorial links underperform because the landing page was thin, the internal linking was broken, or the site architecture buried the pages that should have gained authority. Off-site and on-site work aren&#039;t separate tracks. They compound.<\/p>\n<h3>Internal linking decides where authority lands<\/h3>\n<p>If your strongest links point at the homepage and never flow onward, your commercial pages stay underpowered. Build topic clusters around your money pages, comparison pages, and use cases. Then push authority from linked pages into the pages that convert or rank.<\/p>\n<p>Orphan pages are another common leak. If a page has no internal links, it&#039;s hard for crawlers and users to find it consistently. That matters more than most founders think, because a linkable asset that nobody can reach through the site structure won&#039;t do much for the rest of the domain.<\/p>\n<h3>Technical hygiene keeps the crawl clean<\/h3>\n<p>Slow pages, duplicate templates, and messy indexation make authority harder to distribute. Fix the basics first. Clean navigation, clear canonicals, and a crawlable structure reduce wasted equity. The point isn&#039;t perfection. The point is to stop the site from bleeding trust in avoidable ways.<\/p>\n<p>A useful external complement is the <a href=\"https:\/\/wiseweb.com.au\/how-to-improve-website-seo\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Wise Web SEO tips<\/a> guide, which is a practical reminder that on-site SEO still matters when you&#039;re trying to turn new backlinks into broader visibility. The best off-site work gets stronger when the site itself is organized enough for those links to matter.<\/p>\n<h3>Build pages worth citing again<\/h3>\n<p>Original data, calculators, comparison tables, and useful tools attract the second and third link from the same audience. That matters because DR growth isn&#039;t only about getting the first mention. It&#039;s about making your domain look like a place worth referencing again. For SaaS and AI startups, that&#039;s often the bridge between a profile that looks active and a profile that keeps compounding.<\/p>\n<p>A profile also benefits from a cleaner distribution layer, and <a href=\"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/ai-directory-submission-service\">AI Directory Submission Service<\/a> can fit that role when the listing quality is high and the directory is indexed. Use it to support discoverability, not to substitute for content worth linking to.<\/p>\n<h2>Your DR Growth Timeline and What to Do This Week<\/h2>\n<p>Founders who move DR stop looking for shortcuts and start managing the timeline. A clean profile, a better source mix, and a steady outreach rhythm beat random spikes every time. The timeline matters because it tells you what kind of work belongs at each stage, and what will waste time if you force it too early.<\/p>\n<p><figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/how-to-improve-domain-rating-growth-timeline.jpg\" alt=\"A timeline chart illustrating the progressive steps to improve domain rating from 0 to over 50.\" \/><\/figure><\/p>\n<h3>Match the tactic to the stage<\/h3>\n<p>At <strong>DR 0 to 10<\/strong>, the job is straightforward. Secure foundational links and show the site across a few credible domains. Curated directories and complete profiles help most here, because the early lift is about trust establishment, not breadth for its own sake.<\/p>\n<p>At <strong>DR 10 to 20<\/strong>, consistency starts to matter more. The source mix should widen, and outreach needs to become repeatable rather than opportunistic. A good profile at this stage starts to show a recognizable pattern, not just a burst of one-off submissions from the same type of site.<\/p>\n<p>At <strong>DR 20 to 50<\/strong>, the work changes again. Editorial links, resource placements, and linkable assets do more of the heavy lifting. The stronger the site gets, the less forgiving the link sources become, because weak links stop moving the score in a meaningful way.<\/p>\n<h3>Watch leading indicators before DR changes<\/h3>\n<p>DR lags behind the work that creates it. Referring domain growth from stronger sites usually shows up first. Improved branded search interest and cleaner indexation around your linked pages also move before the score does. If those are moving and DR is flat, you are usually in the lag window, not at a dead end.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Track the profile, not just the score. The number changes after the underlying authority has already started to improve.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h3>What to do in the next seven days<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Run the backlink audit:<\/strong> Check Ahrefs, Search Console, and toxicity signals.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Claim five core profiles:<\/strong> Focus on trusted startup and software directories.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Fix three orphan pages:<\/strong> Add internal links from relevant pages.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Send three targeted pitches:<\/strong> Pick sites with real topical overlap.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Set a monthly review:<\/strong> Track referring domains, anchors, and indexation together.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If you are deciding whether to do this in-house or through a manual directory submission service, StartupSubmit is one option for structured startup and SaaS listings without bot-driven noise. For founders who want a faster path to credible profiles and cleaner discovery signals, StartupSubmit is worth checking before the next outreach sprint.<\/p>\n<p>If you want a cleaner backlink foundation without spending a week filling out repetitive forms, StartupSubmit handles manual startup and SaaS directory submissions across credible platforms and returns a trackable report of what was placed. It fits when you are trying to improve domain rating through real referring domains, not spam. Use StartupSubmit as part of a broader link-building plan that includes editorial outreach and on-site cleanup.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Most founders hear the same bad advice on domain rating. Build more links. Blast more directories. Chase bigger numbers. That&#039;s how you end up with a backlink profile that looks busy and still doesn&#039;t move DR much at all. The actual lever is not raw link count, it&#039;s unique referring domains from sites that carry&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3823,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_blocks_custom_css":"","_kad_blocks_head_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_body_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_footer_custom_js":"","_kadence_starter_templates_imported_post":false,"_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[90,91,26,34,79],"class_list":["post-3824","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog","tag-domain-rating","tag-dr-improvement","tag-link-building","tag-saas-seo","tag-startup-backlinks"],"taxonomy_info":{"category":[{"value":1,"label":"Blog"}],"post_tag":[{"value":90,"label":"domain rating"},{"value":91,"label":"DR improvement"},{"value":26,"label":"link building"},{"value":34,"label":"saas seo"},{"value":79,"label":"startup backlinks"}]},"featured_image_src_large":["https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/how-to-improve-domain-rating-seo-guide-1024x576.jpg",1024,576,true],"author_info":{"display_name":"James","author_link":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/author\/airtel\/"},"comment_info":2,"category_info":[{"term_id":1,"name":"Blog","slug":"blog","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":1,"taxonomy":"category","description":"Your blog category","parent":0,"count":98,"filter":"raw","cat_ID":1,"category_count":98,"category_description":"Your blog category","cat_name":"Blog","category_nicename":"blog","category_parent":0}],"tag_info":[{"term_id":90,"name":"domain rating","slug":"domain-rating","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":90,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":1,"filter":"raw"},{"term_id":91,"name":"DR improvement","slug":"dr-improvement","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":91,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":1,"filter":"raw"},{"term_id":26,"name":"link building","slug":"link-building","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":26,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":2,"filter":"raw"},{"term_id":34,"name":"saas seo","slug":"saas-seo","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":34,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":29,"filter":"raw"},{"term_id":79,"name":"startup backlinks","slug":"startup-backlinks","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":79,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":2,"filter":"raw"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3824","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3824"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3824\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3829,"href":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3824\/revisions\/3829"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3823"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3824"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3824"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3824"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}