{"id":4280,"date":"2026-10-16T10:10:04","date_gmt":"2026-10-16T10:10:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/website-ranking-for-keyword\/"},"modified":"2026-10-16T10:10:09","modified_gmt":"2026-10-16T10:10:09","slug":"website-ranking-for-keyword","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/website-ranking-for-keyword\/","title":{"rendered":"Website Ranking for Keyword: The Founder&#8217;s Playbook"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>You can usually tell when a SaaS page is close, but not quite there. The title is right, the content is decent, and the founder keeps asking why the page still isn&#039;t moving for the keyword that matters. That&#039;s because <strong>website ranking for keyword<\/strong> is rarely a single-number problem. It&#039;s a mix of relevance, discovery, authority, and distribution, and if you only stare at one position in one tool, you miss most of the story.<\/p>\n<p>Teams often chase the wrong signal. They celebrate a jump on a keyword tracker, then wonder why Search Console impressions are flat and pipeline haven&#039;t changed. The better move is to treat ranking like a visibility system, then work the parts you can influence this month.<\/p>\n<h2>What Ranking for a Keyword Actually Tells You<\/h2>\n<p>A founder sees \u201cwe rank #3\u201d in a dashboard and assumes the page is performing. That number needs context. Google Search Console reports an <strong>impression-weighted average position<\/strong>, so the result changes with the query, device, country, and search appearance. One headline figure compresses all those variables into a single line.<\/p>\n<p>A page can appear to lose ground while gaining useful reach. As it starts showing for more non-branded searches, newer impressions may come from lower positions and pull down the average. If those searches match the product and generate qualified visits, the page is expanding its discovery rather than failing.<\/p>\n<p><figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/website-ranking-for-keyword-seo-infographic.jpg\" alt=\"An infographic explaining that SEO ranking is based on impression-weighted positions, keyword variations, search volume visibility, and data analysis.\" \/><\/figure><\/p>\n<h3>Stop talking about one rank<\/h3>\n<p>Measure keyword visibility as a distribution:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Exact-query rank<\/strong>, showing where the page appears for the core phrase.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Non-branded coverage<\/strong>, showing whether new prospects can find the company without knowing its name.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Position bands<\/strong>, particularly positions 1 to 3, 4 to 10, and 11 to 20.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Impressions and clicks<\/strong>, which separate exposure from visits.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Country and device performance<\/strong>, because results can differ sharply between markets and screens.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<blockquote>\n<p><strong>Practical rule:<\/strong> if a page appears for more relevant searches, its average position can worsen while its business value improves.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The click curve still matters. An analysis of <strong>4,000,000 organic search results<\/strong> found that the first result earned an average CTR of <strong>27.6%<\/strong>, roughly <strong>28 out of every 100 organic clicks<\/strong>, and was about <strong>10 times<\/strong> more likely to receive a click than the tenth result (<a href=\"https:\/\/backlinko.com\/google-ctr-stats\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Backlinko<\/a>). Results eight through ten had nearly identical CTRs, so page-one visibility does not make every position equally valuable.<\/p>\n<p>Use a discovery-and-distribution framework instead of a single rank check. Track how many relevant queries produce impressions, where those impressions sit within the position bands, which markets and devices generate them, and whether clicks follow. Then connect those clicks to qualified visits and pipeline.<\/p>\n<p>For founders, the better question is not \u201cAre we rank #3?\u201d Ask, \u201cHow many relevant searches find us, where do we appear, and do those impressions turn into useful clicks?\u201d That measure is harder to manipulate and closer to revenue.<\/p>\n<h2>How Search Engines Decide What Ranks<\/h2>\n<p>A SaaS page can mention a keyword repeatedly and still miss the searcher&#039;s need. Google evaluates relevance, quality, and the relationship between the page and the query, then selects the result most likely to help. Your ranking work should therefore improve both topical fit and distribution, rather than chase one position.<\/p>\n<p>Start with intent. For <strong>AI project management software<\/strong>, the title, H1, URL, and surrounding internal links should point to the same need. The copy must then prove the match with use cases, limitations, integrations, pricing context, and enough product detail for buyers to judge fit quickly.<\/p>\n<h3>Edit the page like a buyer will read it<\/h3>\n<p>Pages that gain traction usually make three things clear: the wording matches the query, the experience behind the advice is credible, and the page removes uncertainty. Generic copy gives search engines and buyers little reason to prefer it over a more useful result.<\/p>\n<p>Authorship, evidence, and page relationships support that judgment. Google&#039;s systems look for helpful, reliable, people-first content and use links to understand how pages connect (<a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/docs\/appearance\/ranking-systems-guide\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Google Search ranking systems guide<\/a>). Make the author&#039;s experience visible, support product claims with specific details, and remove padded language.<\/p>\n<p>Use this editing test before publishing:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Match the query in the title and H1.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>State the category and use case near the top.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Show what the product does in concrete terms.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Explain who it suits and who should choose something else.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Link to supporting pages with descriptive anchors.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>For a plain-English walkthrough of how intent and on-page work fit together, this guide to <a href=\"https:\/\/boocoo.au\/blog\/how-to-improve-google-search-ranking\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">improve search visibility Brisbane<\/a> is a useful reference. The same principles apply to SaaS pages: clarify the search need, answer it directly, and make the next action obvious.<\/p>\n<p>Page experience supports the result rather than replacing relevance. Google&#039;s guidance places intent satisfaction and trustworthy content at the centre, with usability acting as a constraint. Fix slow loading, mobile display problems, and intrusive elements, then spend the remaining effort making the page more useful.<\/p>\n<p>Measure whether the page earns discovery beyond its first organic slot. Track the relevant queries that generate impressions, the position ranges where those impressions appear, and whether they become qualified visits. A page that appears for more closely related searches can create greater business value even if its average position changes.<\/p>\n<h2>Technical Foundations That Decide If Your Page Even Gets Evaluated<\/h2>\n<p>You publish a launch page, share it in a few places, and wait for rankings that never show up. Usually the problem is not \u201cbad SEO content.\u201d Google never fully got the page into circulation in the first place.<\/p>\n<p>Ranking starts after four things happen: discovery, crawling, rendering, and indexing. Google documents those paths clearly, and early-stage SaaS sites fail on them more often than founders expect. Discovery often begins through links from known pages, with XML sitemaps and redirects helping Google find new URLs (<a href=\"https:\/\/support.google.com\/webmasters\/answer\/7451184?hl=en\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Google Search Central<\/a>). If your page has no meaningful internal links and no external paths pointing toward it, you have a distribution problem before you have a ranking problem.<\/p>\n<p><figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/website-ranking-for-keyword-technical-seo.jpg\" alt=\"A diagram illustrating the four technical foundations of website ranking: discovery, crawling, rendering, and indexing by Google.\" \/><\/figure><\/p>\n<p>Here is the order that saves time.<\/p>\n<p>First, check <strong>discovery<\/strong>. Every page that matters should be reachable through crawlable HTML <code>&lt;a&gt;<\/code> links and listed in your XML sitemap. Then check <strong>crawling<\/strong>. Review <code>robots.txt<\/code>, status codes, canonicals, and redirect chains so Googlebot can request the right URL without friction.<\/p>\n<p>Next, verify <strong>rendering<\/strong>. If the core copy, headings, pricing context, or product proof only appears after heavy JavaScript execution, you are forcing Google to work harder than necessary. Put the important meaning in the initial HTML where possible.<\/p>\n<p>Then confirm <strong>indexing<\/strong> in Search Console. URL Inspection and indexing reports tell you whether the page made it into Google&#039;s system. If it has not, rewriting copy is busywork.<\/p>\n<p>Internal links deserve more attention than they usually get. Google uses link relationships and surrounding context to understand page topics, so a descriptive anchor like \u201csee our AI scheduling software\u201d carries real signal. \u201cLearn more\u201d does not. Founders who want broader discovery should link from docs, blog posts, comparison pages, and feature pages using language that matches the job the destination page does.<\/p>\n<p>If Google cannot crawl the page cleanly, you are storing content, not competing in search.<\/p>\n<p>Do one field test before you touch another paragraph. Open the page, view source, and ask whether a crawler can understand the offer, topic, and target query without guessing. If not, fix the page structure first.<\/p>\n<p>For teams adding more discovery paths through manual listings, <a href=\"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/saas-directory-submission-service\/\">StartupSubmit&#039;s SaaS directory submission service<\/a> can support distribution. It does not replace crawlability on your own site.<\/p>\n<h2>Building the Link and Authority Profile a New Site Lacks<\/h2>\n<p>A new SaaS site can publish an excellent page and still lose to an older domain. Older sites usually have more editorial references, brand mentions, and history. Links help search engines connect one page to another and assess whether a site belongs in the conversation around a topic.<\/p>\n<p>Founders waste time by collecting every available link. Junk directories and link farms add noise without building authority. Build a varied profile instead, with placements that support discovery, relevance, and buyer trust.<\/p>\n<h3>Compare your link channels before you waste time<\/h3>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tr>\n<th>Channel<\/th>\n<th>Typical Effort<\/th>\n<th align=\"right\">Time to Publish<\/th>\n<th>Link Attribute<\/th>\n<th>Best For<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Product-led mentions<\/td>\n<td>Medium<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">Slow<\/td>\n<td>Often editorial<\/td>\n<td>Category pages, comparison pages, branded discovery<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Digital PR and original data<\/td>\n<td>High<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">Slow<\/td>\n<td>Editorial and earned<\/td>\n<td>Competitive keywords, thought leadership<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Community contributions<\/td>\n<td>Medium<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">Fast to medium<\/td>\n<td>Varies<\/td>\n<td>Niche topics, problem-solving queries<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Curated directories and profiles<\/td>\n<td>Low to medium<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">Fast to medium<\/td>\n<td>Often profile-based<\/td>\n<td>Brand discovery, startup and SaaS searches<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table><\/figure>\n<p>Evaluate each opportunity through three filters: does the domain attract real visitors, does its audience overlap with yours, and would a buyer use the page to evaluate software? Reject a generic web directory with no software audience, even if it offers an easy link. Keep a focused SaaS directory or an integration partner page that puts your product in front of relevant users.<\/p>\n<p>Use third-party authority metrics, traffic signals, and topical fit together. Authority scores help compare prospects, but they do not prove that a link will improve rankings. A stronger opportunity has a visible audience in your category and a clear reason for your product to appear there. For citation-style placements that complement this channel mix, see the <a href=\"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/local-citation-service\/\">local citation service breakdown<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Product ecosystem mentions often outperform random backlinks because they add context near a buying decision. Integration partners, review sites, and podcasts can introduce your brand to people already researching a solution. Pursue placements where the surrounding topic explains why your product belongs.<\/p>\n<p>Community participation works under the same rule. Thoughtful answers in founder communities, niche forums, and technical discussions can generate brand searches and referral visits. Write for the audience first, and let the link support the contribution. Cheap link schemes produce neither useful discovery nor lasting authority.<\/p>\n<h2>Directory Submissions and the Honest Way to Run Them<\/h2>\n<p>Directory submissions sit between SEO and PR. A credible listing gives your company a public profile on a relevant platform, with a possible link and another route for prospects to discover you. A careless campaign produces thin pages, rejected entries, and cleanup work.<\/p>\n<p>Google defines link spam as creating links primarily to manipulate rankings (<a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/docs\/essentials\/spam-policies\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Google spam policies<\/a>). Use that standard when judging the work. A sound campaign resembles citation building: each listing has a clear reason to exist, accurate information, and a relevant audience.<\/p>\n<p>Selection comes first. Choose directories that match your product, market, or software category. Complete the meaningful fields, write a platform-specific description, select the closest category, and send visitors to the product page that supports the listing. Copying one generic description across every site signals low effort and can create duplicate profiles.<\/p>\n<p>Run the campaign with an operator&#039;s record, not a spreadsheet full of promises. Track the target directory, submission date, status, category, and published URL. A process like <a href=\"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/directory-submission-service\/\">StartupSubmit&#039;s directory submission service<\/a> shows what hand-checked, itemized submission work looks like in practice.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><strong>Founder rule:<\/strong> if a vendor cannot show the live listing, its category, and its publication status, you do not know what you bought.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>StartupSubmit focuses on manual directory submissions and itemized reporting. That approach helps catch duplicate listings, incorrect categories, and descriptions that do not fit a directory&#039;s editorial standards. It also separates work completed from placements published.<\/p>\n<p>Use this vendor screen before approving a campaign:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Which directories are targeted, and why do they fit the product?<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>How do you choose categories when a directory&#039;s taxonomy is ambiguous?<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>How do you handle duplicate profiles and category conflicts?<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>What happens after a directory rejects a listing?<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Will you document screenshots, acceptance notes, and publication status?<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>A directory profile supports discovery, but it does not repair a weak page or guarantee indexing. Keep the product page accessible, useful, and aligned with the search intent before paying for distribution. The listing should reinforce a relevant destination, not compensate for one that fails to answer the query.<\/p>\n<p>I would choose a small set of accurate listings on relevant platforms over a large batch of careless submissions. Relevance creates a believable footprint. Volume without editorial judgment creates maintenance work.<\/p>\n<h2>Measuring Whether Your Ranking Work Is Actually Working<\/h2>\n<p>Founders don&#039;t need a giant dashboard. They need one measurement habit that stops them from fooling themselves. The best setup combines search performance, real visitor behavior, and verified listing data.<\/p>\n<p>Start with Google Search Console. Track <strong>impressions<\/strong>, <strong>clicks<\/strong>, and <strong>average position<\/strong> for the target query across the same date ranges every time. Then segment by landing page, because a single page can behave very differently from the rest of the site.<\/p>\n<h3>Use a simple monthly scorecard<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Search Console performance:<\/strong> query impressions, clicks, and average position.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Analytics behavior:<\/strong> referral sessions and conversions from the pages you worked on.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Directory proof:<\/strong> live listing URLs, acceptance notes, and screenshots.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Authority growth:<\/strong> new referring domains where the data is available.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The right external benchmark is useful, but only as a comparison point. A resource like <a href=\"https:\/\/www.serockstars.com\/blog\/sales-engineer-kpi\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PreSales performance benchmarks<\/a> is a reminder that teams need consistent scorekeeping, not vanity numbers. SEO works the same way. If you don&#039;t compare the same windows and the same pages, your conclusions won&#039;t hold.<\/p>\n<p>Be careful with third-party backlink scores. Domain Rating can help you compare profile strength across sites, but it&#039;s not a Google ranking factor. It&#039;s useful for sorting options, not proving causation.<\/p>\n<p>AI Overviews complicate the old click logic too. Pew Research Center found that about <strong>18% of searches<\/strong> produced an AI-generated summary in March 2025, and when one appeared, users clicked a traditional result in only <strong>8% of visits<\/strong> versus <strong>15%<\/strong> when no summary appeared (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/short-reads\/2025\/07\/22\/google-users-are-less-likely-to-click-on-links-when-an-ai-summary-appears-in-the-results\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Pew Research Center<\/a>). That means rank alone is less satisfying as a success metric than it used to be.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>A higher position that doesn&#039;t change clicks, assisted conversions, or branded demand is just a prettier chart.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>So read the data like an operator. Query-level exports tell you whether the page is growing into new searches. Date comparisons show whether movement is real. Landing-page segmentation tells you whether the work hit the right URL. If those three don&#039;t line up, the ranking claim is probably smoke.<\/p>\n<h2>A 90-Day Plan to Move a New SaaS Page Up the SERPs<\/h2>\n<p>The first month should be boring. Fix the crawl layer, sharpen the money page against search intent, and publish one supporting article that answers a real question buyers ask. If the page still isn&#039;t indexable or the message is fuzzy, nothing else matters.<\/p>\n<h3>Days 1 to 30<\/h3>\n<p>Use a basic checklist, not a content brainstorm. The <a href=\"https:\/\/designstack.co.uk\/seo-checklist-for-new-websites\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">10-step SEO guide for new websites<\/a> is useful here because it forces the unglamorous stuff first. Get the page reachable, get the messaging tight, and get Search Console data flowing.<\/p>\n<h3>Days 31 to 60<\/h3>\n<p>Start pushing authority. Work the four link channels from earlier, but set standards before you send a single pitch. If a directory or mention won&#039;t fit the product, won&#039;t be published, or won&#039;t be documented, drop it.<\/p>\n<h3>Days 61 to 90<\/h3>\n<p>Add manual directory and profile work through a service like <a href=\"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/best-startup-directories\/\">StartupSubmit&#039;s best startup directories<\/a> if that fits your stack, and insist on reporting that includes live URLs, acceptance notes, and screenshots. Then compare the Search Console baseline to the endpoint and see what changed.<\/p>\n<p>A clean 90-day checkpoint looks like this:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Day 30:<\/strong> Page is crawlable, indexed or clearly in progress, and the copy matches the query.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Day 60:<\/strong> Supporting content is live, links are coming in, and the page is gaining query coverage.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Day 90:<\/strong> You can see whether the page, the keyword, and the market are moving together.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>If they are, keep going. If they aren&#039;t, either the query is too hard, the page is the wrong asset, or the content isn&#039;t solving the right problem. Don&#039;t keep feeding a broken target just because the team already spent time on it.<\/p>\n<h2>Founder Questions on Keyword Ranking Answered<\/h2>\n<p><strong>How long before a new SaaS page moves?<\/strong><br>Often long enough that founders get impatient and change too much too soon. Give the page a real runway, then judge it by impressions, clicks, and query spread, not one lucky rank check.<\/p>\n<p><strong>How do I know a directory vendor is legit?<\/strong><br>They should show live URLs, publication status, and screenshots. If they only talk about submissions, they&#039;re hiding the part that matters.<\/p>\n<p><strong>What if rankings stall?<\/strong><br>Check intent first, then crawlability, then links. Most stalled pages are either misaligned, under-linked, or too thin to deserve the query.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Do AI Overviews make ranking useless?<\/strong><br>No. They make <strong>ranking alone<\/strong> incomplete. You still want visibility, but you also want branded demand, citations, and clicks that survive answer boxes.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p>If you want a cleaner way to build discoverable startup profiles without the spammy submission grind, visit <a href=\"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\">StartupSubmit<\/a> and look at how manual directory placements, acceptance tracking, and live reporting can support your SEO work. If you&#039;re trying to rank a new SaaS page this month, that&#039;s the kind of help that fits the job.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>You can usually tell when a SaaS page is close, but not quite there. The title is right, the content is decent, and the founder keeps asking why the page still isn&#039;t moving for the keyword that matters. That&#039;s because website ranking for keyword is rarely a single-number problem. It&#039;s a mix of relevance, discovery,&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4279,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_blocks_custom_css":"","_kad_blocks_head_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_body_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_footer_custom_js":"","_kadence_starter_templates_imported_post":false,"_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[54,199,34,198,30],"class_list":["post-4280","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog","tag-backlinks","tag-keyword-ranking","tag-saas-seo","tag-seo","tag-startup-marketing"],"taxonomy_info":{"category":[{"value":1,"label":"Blog"}],"post_tag":[{"value":54,"label":"backlinks"},{"value":199,"label":"keyword ranking"},{"value":34,"label":"saas seo"},{"value":198,"label":"SEO"},{"value":30,"label":"startup marketing"}]},"featured_image_src_large":["https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/website-ranking-for-keyword-seo-guide-1024x576.jpg",1024,576,true],"author_info":{"display_name":"James","author_link":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/author\/airtel\/"},"comment_info":0,"category_info":[{"term_id":1,"name":"Blog","slug":"blog","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":1,"taxonomy":"category","description":"Your blog category","parent":0,"count":152,"filter":"raw","cat_ID":1,"category_count":152,"category_description":"Your blog category","cat_name":"Blog","category_nicename":"blog","category_parent":0}],"tag_info":[{"term_id":54,"name":"backlinks","slug":"backlinks","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":54,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":16,"filter":"raw"},{"term_id":199,"name":"keyword ranking","slug":"keyword-ranking","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":199,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":1,"filter":"raw"},{"term_id":34,"name":"saas seo","slug":"saas-seo","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":34,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":65,"filter":"raw"},{"term_id":198,"name":"SEO","slug":"seo","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":198,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":1,"filter":"raw"},{"term_id":30,"name":"startup marketing","slug":"startup-marketing","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":30,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":44,"filter":"raw"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4280","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4280"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4280\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4283,"href":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4280\/revisions\/4283"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4279"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4280"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4280"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/startupsubmit.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4280"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}